Category: casino spiele online ohne anmeldung

Diamonds Are Forever Review

Diamonds Are Forever Review Orlebar Brown Polo Shirts Size Guide

Diamonds Are Forever. Das neue Album der amerikanischen Rockband Legs Diamond rotiert seit einiger Zeit in meinem Player. Die Band feiert in diesem Jahr​. This item:Diamonds Are Forever by John Barry Audio CD £ Only 7 left in stock Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 21 April Verified Purchase. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Diamonds Are Forever at rofargarnvingaker.se Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Diamonds are Forever (James Bond ): rofargarnvingaker.se: Fleming, Ian, Foden, Giles: I'm not convinced by Victor's review that the villains lack menace and it is​. Achtung, Achtung: Bevor ich zum eigentlichen Review des ersten richtigen LEGS DIAMOND-Albums seit (The Wish) komme, habe ich.

Diamonds Are Forever Review

Diamonds Are Forever Shirt- Frottee-Hemd In Matchstick Ob Sie vorhaben, die Welt zu retten, oder einfach nur auf Entdeckungsreise gehen möchten – in. Diamonds Are Forever. Das neue Album der amerikanischen Rockband Legs Diamond rotiert seit einiger Zeit in meinem Player. Die Band feiert in diesem Jahr​. DVD-Review: Connerys Abschied - OutNow hat «James Bond - Diamonds Are Forever ()» für dich angesehen.

Diamonds Are Forever Review - Seite teilen:

Auch die üblichen teilweise nicht realisierbaren Gags sind mit von der Partie. Thanks for your detailed feedback, very much appreciated. Your transaction is secure. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1.

Rate this movie. Oof, that was Rotten. Meh, it passed the time. So Fresh: Absolute Must See! You're almost there!

Just confirm how you got your ticket. Cinemark Coming Soon. Regal Coming Soon. By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

Bond looks better than ever, partly because Sean Connery has returned to play him. Jay Cocks. Diamonds Are Forever doesn't carry the same quality or flair as its many predecessors.

Variety Staff. Assorted ladies, a few quick lines, and one good chase, making for a mediocre entry in the series. Dave Kehr. The movie's momentum is such that one never has much time to react to its lack of reason, only to its sensations of speed and narrow escape, and to the splendor of its crazy gadgets and dcor.

Vincent Canby. We see different movies for different reasons, and Diamonds Are Forever is great at doing the things we see a James Bond movie for.

Roger Ebert. This might be the last time for another several features that Bond actually feels like a secret agent. Mike Massie.

Maybe I'm doing Diamonds a disservice. There are some fun moments and some silly moments that I can't defend like multiple Blofelds but sadly I felt cheated and still do on what this film could have been.

Kelechi Ehenulo. How good it was to see the gadgets again, the gymnastic grace of the fantasy-violence, the comedy of the imaginary sex, and that quality of the Bond pictures at their best which I can only call geniality.

Thomas Berger. Has some dramatic merit and is one of the better films in the entire franchise. PJ Nabarro. The script is poor, the comedy ill-timed and the ending anticlimactic.

What more can I say? David Hogan. Has its flaws, but being a boring Bond movie isn't one of them. It may not hit top tier status, but Connery makes "Diamonds Are Forever" another gem in the mythos.

Jeffrey Lyles. Top Box Office. More Top Movies Trailers. Certified Fresh Picks. Black Mirror: Season 5. Fargo: Season 3.

Into The Dark: Season 2. Game of Thrones: Season 8. Killing Eve: Season 3. Lovecraft Country: Season 1. The Mandalorian: Season 1.

Orphan Black: Season 5. Watchmen: Season 1. Certified Fresh Pick. View All. Whoa, Keanu. RT Comic-Con Ketchup.

Log in with Facebook. Email address. Log In. First Name. Last Name. By signing up, you agree to receiving newsletters from Rotten Tomatoes.

You may later unsubscribe. Create your account Already have an account? Email Address. Real Quick. We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email.

Please click the link below to receive your verification email. Cancel Resend Email. Diamonds Are Forever View Collection.

Add Article. Diamonds Are Forever Critics Consensus Diamonds are Forever is a largely derivative affair, but it's still pretty entertaining nonetheless, thanks to great stunts, witty dialogue, and the presence of Sean Connery.

See score details. Rate And Review Submit review Want to see. Super Reviewer. Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten. What did you think of the movie?

Step 2 of 2 How did you buy your ticket? Let's get your review verified. Fandango AMCTheatres. More Info.

Submit By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

How did you buy your ticket? View All Photos Movie Info. In this spy adventure, James Bond is involved in a scheme by the insidious Ernst Blofeld to force the world powers to disarm so that he can take over the globe.

Folksinger Jimmy Dean shows up briefly as a Howard Hughes-like reclusive billionaire, while Lana Wood is a "human prop.

Guy Hamilton. Richard Maibaum , Tom Mankiewicz. Oct 17, Sean Connery as James Bond. Jill St. John as Tiffany Case. Charles Gray as Ernst Blofeld.

Lana Wood as Plenty O'Toole. Jimmy Dean as Willard Whyte. Bruce Cabot as Saxby. Putter Smith as Mr. Bruce Glover as Mr.

Norman Burton as Leiter. Ed Call as Maxie. Joseph Fürst as Dr. Bernard Lee as M. George A. Desmond Llewelyn as Q. Lois Maxwell as Miss Moneypenny.

Leonard Barr as Shady Tree. Laurence Naismith as Sir Donald Monger. Burt Metcalfe as Maxwell. Margaret Lacey as Mrs.

Joe Robinson as Peter Franks. Donna Garratt as Bambi. Trina Parks as Thumper. Ed Bishop as Klaus Hergersheimer. Larry Blake as Barker. Henry Rowland as Dentist.

Nicky Blair as Doorman. Constantin de Goguel as Aide To Metz. Production values: Bond's globetrotting brings him to the glitz and pseudo-grandeur of Las Vegas in all of its tacky glory.

It makes for a nicely surrealistic backdrop, appropriate for the film's self-mocking attitude -- though a major chase scene is marred by the large number of tourists standing along the route, watching the filming.

Bonus Points: The Bond producers' love of unorthodox casting pays off with the selection of country singer and sausage maker Jimmy Dean as the reclusive millionaire based on Howard Hughes.

It is such a bizarre choice, yet Dean's country boy charm is a wonderful contrast to both Hughes' nutty behavior and to the bemused sophistication of Bond.

Whatever the series loses in thrills it makes up for in fun. Bond-o-meter Rating: 81 points out of In this 7th Bond movie, there is little of Bond's prowess in sex and violence Connery's return to his role for a final throw is simply disappointing Seeking a diamond smuggler, Bond has adventures in Amsterdam, in a Los Angeles crematorium, in various Las Vegas gambling parlors, and in a secret factory in Nevada desert Jill St.

John is the free agent who defies Bond's charm, but is reduced to a weak heroine, as she displays none of the class we've come to expect of a Bond girl Nevertheless this redheaded diamond smuggler becomes the first American Bond beauty who does know how to wear a 'nice little nothing.

He hates martial music and takes no chances with his staff His hit men are "gay and fun," Mr Kidd and Mr Wint He is held prisoner in his desert mansion which is protected by two female karate experts nicknamed Bambi and Thumper Desmond Llewelyn is Bond's gadget man, Q, who tries out an electromagnetic controller for his own amusement that makes an entire raw of slot machines hits jackpots Lois Maxwell is, as always, the loving Moneypenny in emigration uniform, this time, who still is aching for a diamond ring; Bernard Lee is the imposing 'M' who assigns to infiltrate the smuggling ring and find out who was stockpiling stolen diamonds; Norman Burton is the CIA agent Felix Leiter who greets Bond and asks which part of the stiff holds the gems; Joseph Fürst is the brilliant scientist Dr Metz, who thinks that Blofeld is a mankind's benefactor, and a believer in world disarmament; and Bruce Cabot is Whyte's treacherous right-hand-man The Spectacular Spider-Man 5 October DAF is one of the weakest, laziest movies in the franchise.

For a start, where is the action? Apart from a good close quarters punch up in a lift, there is hardly any. What remains is lacking in energy and played mainly for laughs.

An awful slapstick car-trashing chase in Vegas. And the big finale is anything but. We have a few of Blofled's henchmen fighting a few helicopters.

Bond does almost nothing except swing Blofeld's escape pod around with a crane. Which brings us to another point - this is without doubt the least serious Bond movie ever.

Blofeld dresses in drag at one stage. Most of the supporting characters are comic relief. The sinister henchmen, Wint and Kidd, would stand out in any other movie due to their extreme black humour, but here they are just wasted.

We even see Q - in Vegas - cheating on a slot machine. At least Connery is back right? He's clearly on set, but equally clearly thinking about his next round of golf.

Even his delivery of 'Bond, James Bond' is awful. He isn't helped by some awful costume decisions, including a brown tweed suit, and a pink!

Connery's huge payout for this film means everything else looks cheaper than before; by the climax you have embarrassing helicopter explosions, clearly animated, that would have been superbly detailed model shots in previous and later movies.

There is virtually nothing good to say about Diamonds. The film is so lacking in energy or excitement that only the plot manages to pull it along.

It's a series of weird and comedic scenes that hardly feel like a Bond movie in any way, and it's hard to believe this came after On Her Majesty's Sceret Service.

The film scrimps so much on the action that you are left watching a bizarre, parallel universe version of Bond where nothing remotely Bond-ish seems to happen.

It feels almost like a live-action version of a Saturday morning Bond cartoon, watered down for the kids Bond never even uses his gun. Two plus points; Shirey Bassey's theme tune is superbly atmospheric and mysterious.

Jill St John is very sexy. That's it. Connery came back, the director of Goldfinger came back, and the result was this farce.

Bogmeister 2 June The pre-credits teaser functions as an epilogue to "On Her Majesty's Secret Service," with Bond hunting his arch-nemesis, Blofeld, in a quick series of scenes throughout the world.

The filmmakers tried to recapture the best of "Goldfinger" in this one, using the same director and singer Bassey on the credits again.

Ending up with even a pale imitation of the best Bonder is not such a bad thing, but it also points to the lack of originality besetting the series by this time.

The danger with all the attempts to be unusual, whether in regard to deaths or chases, is that it dips into a cutesy atmosphere a bit too far. Those fans fond of the seriousness in the previous film would probably not be amused, since it comes across as a dark parody of the usual spy stuff.

From their very first scene in the desert, where they seem to draw inspiration from a scorpion, these two oddballs have the audience guessing on what they would do next - they are goofy, yes, but also lethal - interesting because they are somewhat original.

Bond's mission, tracking an involved diamond smuggling operation, takes him briefly to Amsterdam, but he ends up in Las Vegas for most of the story.

A subplot involves a missing billionaire, obviously patterned after Howard Hughes, who was still living as a recluse at this time.

M and, especially Moneypenny, have less screen time in this one, though Q pops up in an amusing scene testing one of his gizmos on some one-armed bandits Vegas is no match for Q.

Though the scenes in Vegas itself are less exotic than those of most Bond films, the film also makes good use of the surrounding desert terrain and there are numerous grand sets, notably a huge futuristic lab building, complete with tests of a fake moon landing, as well as a house built into the rocks.

There is a good auto chase on the streets of Vegas, which has the infamous 'two-wheely' by Bond thru an alley. The two weird assassins pop up every now and then; they even have their own theme score, an eerie yet playful little tune.

One of them looks very strange Smith, a jazz musician with no acting experience , while the other actor Glover, father of Crispin Glover looks more normal but has very strange inflections to his speech.

Every time they show up, a strange tension surfaces for the viewer. Their scene has a lot of energy and you won't soon forget them.

The story is well-paced for the most part, with less of those slow spots that afflicted many of the later Bonders. However, a couple of deleted scenes with the Plenty character makes things a bit confusing for her character arc.

Connery is, of course, several years older since his last Bonder, but he looks pretty much the same as he did in "You Only Live Twice.

But Bond is still the ideal male here and it's still believable that femme fatale Tiffany falls for him by the end. She's a curious mixture of flaky girl and worldly woman, usually flippant in her approach, sort of reflecting the trivial nature of this Bonder, where nothing happening is really of grave import.

That's why, when Blofeld's him again real plan is revealed, it's a bit out of left field; all of sudden, we see a super laser detonating missiles around the globe and everything has changed into matters of international import.

Blofeld, as played by Gray, is more urbane and effeminate than the previous two versions, more attuned to a villain planning world domination, but he's also too civilized, too polite to Bond in the climactic sequence, diffusing his threatening presence.

The climax on that oil rig sea platform in Baja is not very well done, with Blofeld's end especially disappointing he would not return, except in the teaser of "For Your Eyes Only".

But, the epilogue is excellent. Bond, but not Connery, would return in "Live and Let Die. I remember seeing this film years and years ago and always had in my mind the image of a body disappearing into bubbling mud gold mashed potato.

This film on first viewing appearts bizarre and weird but actually grows on you after several viewings. It has many weird facets - not least the background music you hear playing on the very first shots of the Willard Whyte Towers I wonder what the building really was - presumably some office block in Las Vegas , weird also the two homosexual killers who are in fact very frightening in their modus operandi, thank God they got their just desserts on the boat at the end - I was waiting for that one.

And there's old "No-neck" Charles Gray with his superb upper class english accent like me! And there's those two weird Girls Thumber and Bambi who prance around like monkeys at WW's summer house!

And there's Willard Whyte himself, God, what a strange accent he has, sound's like a 's cowboy. It seems incredible he has been locked up for five years in a flat and never managed to escape.

When I compare this film to the rubbish they put into Goldeneye and The world in not enough, I actually found it better than I thought on first viewing.

Also the plot is a bit complicated and rather disarms on first viewing. But having watched the film four times, I now find the action sequences very good, especially the shoot out on the oil-rig at the end.

Bond's female companion JSJ is absolutely gorgeous and seems to have aged well like good wine on the dvd there is an interview with her today.

So all in all I think the film will age well and gain value in time to come whereas when it came out, it was probably considered rather Obsure.

True, Connery's performance itself is less good than in previous Bonds, but the rest makes up for this. Note also the superb theme song by Shirley Bassey and the graphically beautiful opening credits which are amongst the best of all the Bond Films M Bernard Lee assigns an under-grade mission to Bond dealing with diamonds robbing but the events go worse.

This time Bond confronts Blofeld Charles Gray and a strange couple , Mr Kid and Mr Wint Bruce Glover and Putter Smith in a intrigue about diamonds smuggling and a final with satellite full of nuclear weapons , holding of the world to ransom.

The film contains spectacular fights , action packed , car chases , apocalyptic and overwhelming scenarios along with the typically glossy ingredients series but Sean Connery looks a little bit boring ,in fact is his Bond last film , before his surprising return.

It is held together by fine acting and above all, and overwhelming level of tongue-in-cheek. Sean Connery as James Bond is cool , he has coldness and toughness , typical characters of the famous personage , but also earns in irony , suavity and smoothness.

The interesting screenplay based on Ian Fleming's novel is written by Richard Maibaum and the recently deceased Tom Mankiewicz. The action is very good , the cinematography by Ted Moore is magnificent , the sets decent , but the real clincher is the fact that Bond is once more performed by a hero with the right stuff.

The struggles were carefully choreographed by very accomplished athletes as a pair gorgeous killer karate female bodyguards and performed like a dance routine requiring each participant to hit their mark at the correct time.

The picture is produced by habituals Harry Saltzman and Albert R. The atmosphere is faithful to the actual location but the interiors on a set at Pinewood Studios.

Appropriate and wonderful -as usual- musical score by John Barry. Main title song is catching and marvelously performed by Shirley Bassey.

Indispensable and essential watching for James Bond fans. In Sean Connery quits the role of James Bond. This film does reasonably well at the box office, but not as well as the previous episodes Furthermore, a big part of the audiences and many critics savage Lazenby's performance, rather pale compared to Connery's Bond portrait.

In '71 producers hire American actor John Gavin for "Diamonds are forever" DAF , but at the very last minute Sean Connery decides to come back to the role for one time only The film is a kind of remake of "Goldfinger" -there is Sean, of course; director Guy Hamilton; Shirley Bassey sings the theme; the story takes place in America; here too we have glamorous elements diamonds instead of gold.

The movie is funny, Sean looks amused and quite relaxed in traveling between Amsterdam and Las Vegas to investigate about a diamond illegal traffic.

Nevertheless it's the "worst" of his Bonds It's his less interesting outing as When we think about him as Bond we think about the episodes of the Sixties, when the series was at its beginning.

The first part of the film is boring, the second half has more action -although the final battle scene is not very well done. Sean is Sean, but here he looks older than his age -curiously he looks fitter and more charming in "Never say never again", an "unofficial" Bond done 12 years later!

By the way his presence in this film saves the show completely and a good entertainment is guaranteed. There he meets beautiful Tiffany Case Jill St.

John , fends off kooky hit men, and comes face-to-face with his arch-nemesis Blofeld Charles Gray. Sean Connery's last 'official' Bond film doesn't get a lot of love from the serious crowd but I happen to like it.

Among the criticisms are that it's "too Americanized," "too much like a comic book," and "too trashy. Personally, I thought it was a lot of fun.

Sean Connery's perfect. My favorite Bond. Charles Gray is a nice Blofeld. John's a great Bond girl. It's got good action, hot women, a memorable Shirley Bassey theme song, and lots of humor.

There's a lot to like about it. If you're someone who enjoys the Bond movies for colorful escapist adventure more than for dark espionage stories, you should like this as much as I do.

HelloTexas11 21 January Sean Connery's last go-round in the initial James Bond series is a quirky entry that I find one of the most enjoyable.

It keeps all of the trappings and recurrent characters we had come to expect in a film but adds a few novel twists which keep things from becoming stale.

Connery's co-star and female lead this time is Jill St. John and forgive me while I drool on my keyboard a moment.

The term 'drop dead gorgeous' must have been invented for her and maybe even specifically for this movie. Casual nudity in mainstream cinema was not yet commonplace, but some of Ms.

John's 'costumes' come about as close as is possible. As Bond aptly puts it shortly after meeting her character, Tiffany Case, "that's a nice little nothing you're almost wearing.

The diamonds in question are to be used on a satellite to focus a laser beam that will destroy nuclear weapons, allowing SPECTRE to blackmail various governments.

Yeah, that old plot again. But it's just enough to hang a number of funny and exciting scenes on, starting in Holland and ending up in Las Vegas.

Maybe the oddest aspect of 'Diamonds Are Forever' is the inclusion of two openly and sometimes outlandishly gay characters, Mr.

Wint and Mr. The plot sometimes veers off into extreme silliness it's hard to recall a chase scene sillier than the one with Bond in the moon-buggy and the special effects range from believable to incredibly cheesy the shot of Chinese missiles being destroyed and a flaming Chinese soldier crossing the screen has to be seen to be believed which, along with the above-mentioned aspects, seem to indicate the series was heading in a more comedic direction just as Connery was making his exit.

Whether this was an improvement is debatable, but Connery was, and is, the definitive Bond and 'Diamonds Are Forever' stands as one of the best films.

Orpington 31 July After the relative commercial failure of On Her Majesty's Secret Service, and the subsequent departure of the unlamented George Lazenby, the Bond producers were desperate to lure Sean Connery back for just one more outing as James Bond.

Connery was reluctant, but the huge sum he was offered to come back was too good to resist, and Diamonds are Forever thus became his last official Bond film.

Sadly it is a thoroughly unworthy exit, for DAF is an inane, flabby film that suffers from lazy scripting and an excess of camp humour, reducing Bond to the level of self-parody.

It seems that the aim of this film was to rekindle the spirit of Goldfinger, after audiences did not take kindly to the relatively serious OHMSS.

Not only did Connery return, but so did Goldfinger director Guy Hamilton and other crew members who had worked on that film; even Shirley Bassey was back to sing the theme tune, which is one of the few good things about DAF.

However, it lacks either the wit or elegance of Goldfinger, relying instead on a succession of bad puns and tedious chase sequences, including a particularly stupid one which sees Bond being pursued across the desert while driving a moon buggy.

The decision to set most of the film in Las Vegas does not help matters, for it is a very un-Bond like place which just serves to make the film feel even more cheap and tacky.

The casting is a mixed bag. Connery never gave a bad performance as OO7, but he is at his most detached and uninterested here, going through the motions but never looking as if he is doing it for anything other than the money.

Even though he was only 40 when he made it, he also looks rather old in this film, which does not help credibility. Charles Gray is OK as Blofeld, but plays it far too camp and never seems the slightest bit menacing, which is not a good idea if you are playing Bond's arch-enemy.

Jill St John's Tiffany Case is a spirited Bond girl, but unaccountably she becomes more and more stupid as the film goes on, and never becomes as strong a character as she should have been.

Wint and Kidd, Blofeld's homosexual henchmen, provide quite good comic value, even though they are outrageous gay stereotypes; nevertheless, their antics seem very out of place in a Bond film, being more suited to Are You Being Served.

As for Jimmy Dean's Willard Whyte, I found him to be one of the most irritating characters in any Bond film, though thankfully he does not get much screen time.

There are some good points in the film, including an effective fight between Bond and Peter Franks in Amsterdam, and a memorable scene in which OO7 has to grapple with two striking young women called Bambi and Thumper.

In general, however, DAF feels tired, trying to compensate for the lack of a decent script with its childish humour and endless stunts.

It is all a long way away from the classic Connery Bonds of the early 60s, and indeed DAF is much closer in tone to the jokey Roger Moore films that would follow it during the rest of the 70s, although most of those have more going for them than this film.

All in all, DAF is more of a feeble exercise in camp comedy than a stylish spy thriller, a sad way for Connery to leave the part that had made him a star.

Of all the Bond films, probably only Moonraker is worse. The 7th official James Bond film Diamonds Are Forever does not have the reputation of being one of the better Bond epics.

But I must admit for having a soft spot for Diamonds Are Forever despite the fact that in hindsight the film has missed some great opportunities.

It could have been a great revenge movie, but it's not. Diamonds Are Forever starts with a very short fight scene in a Japanese decor, telling us that it's starting where the 5th Bondfilm You Only Live Twice left off.

At the time On Her Majesty's Secret Service was considered a failure it wasn't and the rumor was that the new James Bond actor George Lazenby got fired he wasn't, he decided not to go on, much to his regret later.

But on the plus side Diamonds Are Forever is one of most efficient Bond films made. The greatest asset of course is that Sean Connery returned to the franchise after being absent in the previous film.

Older and a little too out of shape, Connery is at his most relaxed in this one and even here he is still the best cinematic interpretation of the character.

A James Bond who has seen and done it all. The only time Bond is really surprised in this film is when he meets Blofeld again, whom he thought he had killed in the prologue.

Diamonds Are Forever may have discarded the revenge plot but It was a financial successful revenge for Sean Connery on the Bond producers.

Connery always felt short changed by the producers but was lured back by United Artists for one more film for an enormous salary which he donated and benefits including a two movie deal.

Diamonds Are Forever is also a guilty pleasure nowadays because Bond gets to do things which today's cinematic heroes can no longer get away with: he hits women, kicks Blofeld's cat and disposes easily of two stereotypical gay men including finishing it off with a one liner.

So, unless you're easily offended, Diamonds Are Forever can also be recommended as a terrific time capsule. TimBoHannon 26 May After four years, 1.

Sadly, the man who electrified the world for six years returned for a problematic movie that at best is a disappointment and at worst a large black stain on his legacy.

Many of the problems that drown "Diamonds Are Forever" show up in the opening minutes. Bond is on the revenge trail following the murder of his wife.

Connery's face remains hidden to raise anticipation, but when it finally appears, my reaction is shock.

At one time he looked like the handsome, debonair ladies man he is supposed to be, but at 41, Connery has outlived the part.

He has more wrinkles, his eyes have darkened with age, he is getting fatter, and his hair is grayer. I once watched a clip online of a scene where he is standing next to Q, played by Desmond Llewelyn, who was 56 years old with white hair.

I initially mistook him for one of Q's assistants. In every possible way, he made the part his own with an authority neither he nor the five actors following him have since been able to equal.

This time he was just doing it for the money, and it shows. In "Goldfinger," he said "Bond, James Bond" with focus and cool.

Here, it is delivered with unexpressive staccato. When he is ordered to put up his hands, he moves them to the side like a man bored with being bored.

Diamond smuggling out of South Africa has risen over the past two years. Since no smuggled stones have reached the market, the British government fears somebody may be accumulating them in preparation for a market dump.

A string of recent murders in South Africa leads them to fear that operations are being shut down, leaving them little time to bust the smugglers.

James Bond is sent undercover as smuggler Peter Franks. His mission takes him to the casinos of Las Vegas, where he discovers the involvement of his old enemy, Ernst Stavro Blofeld Charles Gray.

Gray is another problem evident from the beginning. Blofeld is supposed to be bald, but even if Gray was bald he would not remotely look or sound the part.

In "From Russia with Love," Blofeld seemed like a god. Gray is not imposing, and seeing the mighty Blofeld dressing as a transvestite is the worst insult in the series.

For the ignominious title of worst Bond villain, Gray loses to Stephen Berkoff from "Octopussy," but barely. When Bond finally discovers Blofeld, how does he react?

He indulges in polite conversation. The movie forgets that Bond is speaking to the man who callously murdered his wife, and that Blofeld is addressing the man who broke his neck.

Another huge minus is the general lack of excitement. It has a good start with an intense elevator fight between Bond and the real Peter Franks. If you see this film, which I strongly discourage, savor that fight, because "Diamonds" becomes pretty anemic afterwards.

The remainder lacks intrinsic interest or excitement. Aside from a slick nighttime street chase, the little action that is left looks fake and slow.

When Bond is faced with trouble, what does he do? He runs, preferably in a phony moon machine. From start to finish, he does not fire a single bullet.

Adding insult is the cheap climax. Six years earlier, this franchise won a visual effects Oscar. Now they are reduced to creating nuclear explosions that look like puffs of smoke.

Connery's salary supposedly slashed the special effects budget even though the franchise made over a million dollar profit since "Goldfinger.

Ironically, it is country singer Jimmy Dean who brings the most convincing act to the table. John and Lana Wood are wasted as the bimbo and harlot, respectively.

Wint Bruce Glover and Mr. Kidd Putter Smith are the gay hit men who don't know each other's first names, and the best I can say about them is that they die entertainingly.

A movie with shoddy writing, substandard acting, misplaced atmosphere and bad characters cannot succeed. Diamonds slowly decay into other forms of carbon, so they are not truly forever.

Neither is Sean Connery. The sixties, peace, love, psychedelia and the peak of Bond mania, passed into history. The Beatles split up, Jim Morrison flat-lined in a bathtub and Vietnam was napalming the American dream to ashes in a controversial conflict that was fast starting to look like an epic fail.

The Bond movies had been spoofed, ripped-off, imitated to near death and creatively dismissed by many critics. Lazenby had jumped ship, convinced that Bond was "old hat" and had no future other than a rattling decline into celluloid oblivion.

And the original Bond returns in a glitzy, camp, sci-fi extravaganza, that still manages to be the fourth highest grossing film in the US of it's year.

No indicator of quality, but certainly of a sustained popularity. DAF is a slyer, more-knowing, self-deprecating artifact of it's time than most give it credit for.

In it's sweep, it satirises the absurdity of Howard Hughes and his eccentric reclusivity, the global obsession over the lunar landings and accompanying conspiracy theory surrounding beliefs of their fakeness , the conquest of space, and pokes fun at the mecca of arbitrary gambling-addicts and those dazzled by the air-headed neon facade of sleazy, hollow glamour.

Beneath the veneer of such glamour, death lurks, dispensed by two gay contract killers in the pay of a criminal cross-dressing mastermind with a penchant for white cats and impersonating a reclusive kidnapped multi-millionaire industrialist.

And making doubles of himself - for some reason. Are we beginning to grasp it's charm yet?

Amazon Price. Top reviews Most recent Top reviews. Filter by. Top international reviews. Osato Spielbank Stuttgart Poker Ergebnisse eindrang. Barry's usual instrumental reworking of the lovely theme song one of Bond's best comes in two versions which are both quite lovely.

Diamonds Are Forever Review Frequently bought together

Famous Vegas Casinos from over 13, locations across the UK Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location? James Bond macht hier keine Ausnahme! Circus, Circus 5. Translate Einzahlung Pokerstars reviews to English. Try all Prime benefits now. Umso mehr erstaunt war ich, als ich die remasterte CD bekam. See Solitaire Kugeln reviews from the United Kingdom. Gray is not imposing, and seeing the mighty Blofeld dressing as a transvestite is the worst insult in the series. Nevertheless it's the "worst" of his Bonds It feels almost like a Group Name For Sheep version of a Saturday morning Bond cartoon, watered down for the kids Bond never even uses his gun. Even scenes such as the infamous Mobil Chevrolet Spin buggy" chase are handled with dignity. Their scene has a lot of energy and you won't soon forget them. Adventure Movies. Join now. Pokerspiel Deutsch Kostenlos this movie Oof, that was Rotten.

Diamonds Are Forever Review Video

Diamonds Are Forever (1971) Review

Sadly it is a thoroughly unworthy exit, for DAF is an inane, flabby film that suffers from lazy scripting and an excess of camp humour, reducing Bond to the level of self-parody.

It seems that the aim of this film was to rekindle the spirit of Goldfinger, after audiences did not take kindly to the relatively serious OHMSS.

Not only did Connery return, but so did Goldfinger director Guy Hamilton and other crew members who had worked on that film; even Shirley Bassey was back to sing the theme tune, which is one of the few good things about DAF.

However, it lacks either the wit or elegance of Goldfinger, relying instead on a succession of bad puns and tedious chase sequences, including a particularly stupid one which sees Bond being pursued across the desert while driving a moon buggy.

The decision to set most of the film in Las Vegas does not help matters, for it is a very un-Bond like place which just serves to make the film feel even more cheap and tacky.

The casting is a mixed bag. Connery never gave a bad performance as OO7, but he is at his most detached and uninterested here, going through the motions but never looking as if he is doing it for anything other than the money.

Even though he was only 40 when he made it, he also looks rather old in this film, which does not help credibility. Charles Gray is OK as Blofeld, but plays it far too camp and never seems the slightest bit menacing, which is not a good idea if you are playing Bond's arch-enemy.

Jill St John's Tiffany Case is a spirited Bond girl, but unaccountably she becomes more and more stupid as the film goes on, and never becomes as strong a character as she should have been.

Wint and Kidd, Blofeld's homosexual henchmen, provide quite good comic value, even though they are outrageous gay stereotypes; nevertheless, their antics seem very out of place in a Bond film, being more suited to Are You Being Served.

As for Jimmy Dean's Willard Whyte, I found him to be one of the most irritating characters in any Bond film, though thankfully he does not get much screen time.

There are some good points in the film, including an effective fight between Bond and Peter Franks in Amsterdam, and a memorable scene in which OO7 has to grapple with two striking young women called Bambi and Thumper.

In general, however, DAF feels tired, trying to compensate for the lack of a decent script with its childish humour and endless stunts.

It is all a long way away from the classic Connery Bonds of the early 60s, and indeed DAF is much closer in tone to the jokey Roger Moore films that would follow it during the rest of the 70s, although most of those have more going for them than this film.

All in all, DAF is more of a feeble exercise in camp comedy than a stylish spy thriller, a sad way for Connery to leave the part that had made him a star.

Of all the Bond films, probably only Moonraker is worse. The 7th official James Bond film Diamonds Are Forever does not have the reputation of being one of the better Bond epics.

But I must admit for having a soft spot for Diamonds Are Forever despite the fact that in hindsight the film has missed some great opportunities.

It could have been a great revenge movie, but it's not. Diamonds Are Forever starts with a very short fight scene in a Japanese decor, telling us that it's starting where the 5th Bondfilm You Only Live Twice left off.

At the time On Her Majesty's Secret Service was considered a failure it wasn't and the rumor was that the new James Bond actor George Lazenby got fired he wasn't, he decided not to go on, much to his regret later.

But on the plus side Diamonds Are Forever is one of most efficient Bond films made. The greatest asset of course is that Sean Connery returned to the franchise after being absent in the previous film.

Older and a little too out of shape, Connery is at his most relaxed in this one and even here he is still the best cinematic interpretation of the character.

A James Bond who has seen and done it all. The only time Bond is really surprised in this film is when he meets Blofeld again, whom he thought he had killed in the prologue.

Diamonds Are Forever may have discarded the revenge plot but It was a financial successful revenge for Sean Connery on the Bond producers.

Connery always felt short changed by the producers but was lured back by United Artists for one more film for an enormous salary which he donated and benefits including a two movie deal.

Diamonds Are Forever is also a guilty pleasure nowadays because Bond gets to do things which today's cinematic heroes can no longer get away with: he hits women, kicks Blofeld's cat and disposes easily of two stereotypical gay men including finishing it off with a one liner.

So, unless you're easily offended, Diamonds Are Forever can also be recommended as a terrific time capsule. TimBoHannon 26 May After four years, 1.

Sadly, the man who electrified the world for six years returned for a problematic movie that at best is a disappointment and at worst a large black stain on his legacy.

Many of the problems that drown "Diamonds Are Forever" show up in the opening minutes. Bond is on the revenge trail following the murder of his wife.

Connery's face remains hidden to raise anticipation, but when it finally appears, my reaction is shock. At one time he looked like the handsome, debonair ladies man he is supposed to be, but at 41, Connery has outlived the part.

He has more wrinkles, his eyes have darkened with age, he is getting fatter, and his hair is grayer. I once watched a clip online of a scene where he is standing next to Q, played by Desmond Llewelyn, who was 56 years old with white hair.

I initially mistook him for one of Q's assistants. In every possible way, he made the part his own with an authority neither he nor the five actors following him have since been able to equal.

This time he was just doing it for the money, and it shows. In "Goldfinger," he said "Bond, James Bond" with focus and cool.

Here, it is delivered with unexpressive staccato. When he is ordered to put up his hands, he moves them to the side like a man bored with being bored.

Diamond smuggling out of South Africa has risen over the past two years. Since no smuggled stones have reached the market, the British government fears somebody may be accumulating them in preparation for a market dump.

A string of recent murders in South Africa leads them to fear that operations are being shut down, leaving them little time to bust the smugglers.

James Bond is sent undercover as smuggler Peter Franks. His mission takes him to the casinos of Las Vegas, where he discovers the involvement of his old enemy, Ernst Stavro Blofeld Charles Gray.

Gray is another problem evident from the beginning. Blofeld is supposed to be bald, but even if Gray was bald he would not remotely look or sound the part.

In "From Russia with Love," Blofeld seemed like a god. Gray is not imposing, and seeing the mighty Blofeld dressing as a transvestite is the worst insult in the series.

For the ignominious title of worst Bond villain, Gray loses to Stephen Berkoff from "Octopussy," but barely. When Bond finally discovers Blofeld, how does he react?

He indulges in polite conversation. The movie forgets that Bond is speaking to the man who callously murdered his wife, and that Blofeld is addressing the man who broke his neck.

Another huge minus is the general lack of excitement. It has a good start with an intense elevator fight between Bond and the real Peter Franks.

If you see this film, which I strongly discourage, savor that fight, because "Diamonds" becomes pretty anemic afterwards. The remainder lacks intrinsic interest or excitement.

Aside from a slick nighttime street chase, the little action that is left looks fake and slow. When Bond is faced with trouble, what does he do?

He runs, preferably in a phony moon machine. From start to finish, he does not fire a single bullet. Adding insult is the cheap climax. Six years earlier, this franchise won a visual effects Oscar.

Now they are reduced to creating nuclear explosions that look like puffs of smoke. Connery's salary supposedly slashed the special effects budget even though the franchise made over a million dollar profit since "Goldfinger.

Ironically, it is country singer Jimmy Dean who brings the most convincing act to the table. John and Lana Wood are wasted as the bimbo and harlot, respectively.

Wint Bruce Glover and Mr. Kidd Putter Smith are the gay hit men who don't know each other's first names, and the best I can say about them is that they die entertainingly.

A movie with shoddy writing, substandard acting, misplaced atmosphere and bad characters cannot succeed. Diamonds slowly decay into other forms of carbon, so they are not truly forever.

Neither is Sean Connery. The sixties, peace, love, psychedelia and the peak of Bond mania, passed into history. The Beatles split up, Jim Morrison flat-lined in a bathtub and Vietnam was napalming the American dream to ashes in a controversial conflict that was fast starting to look like an epic fail.

The Bond movies had been spoofed, ripped-off, imitated to near death and creatively dismissed by many critics. Lazenby had jumped ship, convinced that Bond was "old hat" and had no future other than a rattling decline into celluloid oblivion.

And the original Bond returns in a glitzy, camp, sci-fi extravaganza, that still manages to be the fourth highest grossing film in the US of it's year.

No indicator of quality, but certainly of a sustained popularity. DAF is a slyer, more-knowing, self-deprecating artifact of it's time than most give it credit for.

In it's sweep, it satirises the absurdity of Howard Hughes and his eccentric reclusivity, the global obsession over the lunar landings and accompanying conspiracy theory surrounding beliefs of their fakeness , the conquest of space, and pokes fun at the mecca of arbitrary gambling-addicts and those dazzled by the air-headed neon facade of sleazy, hollow glamour.

Beneath the veneer of such glamour, death lurks, dispensed by two gay contract killers in the pay of a criminal cross-dressing mastermind with a penchant for white cats and impersonating a reclusive kidnapped multi-millionaire industrialist.

And making doubles of himself - for some reason. Are we beginning to grasp it's charm yet? There are so many continuity, plot and logic errors in DAF, that sooner or later one might suspect they are deliberate.

Connery coasts through, nonchalant and laid-back and still irrefutably BOND. DAF, it's fair to say, lost the plot, in the tipsy haze of a high-tech Rat Pack hangover.

But, as a kid I loved it unconditionally, and I still think it's a blast today. There's something about it's inherent sincerity and lack of forced, contrived, self-conscious cynicism that appeals.

There are some crackling one-liners and dialogue, a ferociously brutal unarmed combat episode in a lift, an eye-melting pink tie, bizarre vehicle chases and the most unconvincing toupee a leading actor ever wore up to that point.

It had a bizarre life of it's own. Oh, did I mention Connery was back as Bond? I'd pay the price of admission for that fact alone. Wouldn't you?

Tweekums 28 August Some people think this is one of the worst Bond films; I wouldn't go that far but it is certainly a lot more frivolous then previous instalments; there was always the occasional one liner but here they come thick and fast.

In the pre-credit sequence. Bond tracks down and apparently kills Blofeld, who is now played by Charles Gray.

With that case wrapped up he is set to work investigating diamonds being smuggled out of South Africa. His sent to Amsterdam where he poses as a known smuggler to get the diamonds of one Tiffany Chase.

In order to find out who is organising the smuggling he then takes them to Los Angeles where he is met and taken to Las Vegas.

As said before this is less serious then the previous films; I don't think it is bad though; in fact I've always rather enjoyed it. Wint; a pair of creepy killers who have a 'witty' line for every occasion.

As one would expect from a Bond film there are plenty of stunts, action and explosions. Over all I'd recommend this to other Bond fans even though it isn't a classic.

DMP-2 24 December This film is excellent. The comedy which has been the culprit for its discredit is excellent. This is the first Bond to be uncensored totally.

This came out 3 years after the MPAA created the rating system which allow for greater creative control to films. The only thing I don't like about this film is that it should be a revenge film See my comment on On Her Majesty's Secret Service and watch it.

Of all the films thats the 4th most profitable. Its evident although a great film, sort of a cult classic, On Her Majesty's Secret Service jinxed this production.

Its evident they wanted to avoid failure, by removing all evidence of it. By forgetting its finale. Lazenby was certainly not better than Connery, but his departure was mistake and a failure.

Diamonds Are Forever although to many a failure, is a very good film. Anyway this film is excellent Connery's 3 and Stands at 5 1.

The Living Daylights 3. The Spy Who Loved Me 4. I've always liked "Diamonds Are Forever". Over the years I've grown to like it so much that I now rank it among the best of the James Bond movies.

It's so much fun. It hits all of the Bond buttons. The story, villains, music, humor, action and stunts are all great.

It also has maybe the best collection of Bond girls ever. Tiffany Case and Plenty O'Toole are both through the roof. Many people are apparently put off by this Bond film.

Sure, Sean Connery is older, you see Blofeld this time with a head of hair and the series seemed a tad out of place in , when the anti-war movement was running strong.

This movie is not Goldfinger, despite the presence of Guy Hamilton at the helm and Shirley Bassey as the singer of the title theme.

What this movie is is a stylish romp that seems to bear some nod to the Batman TV series in terms of style. The original femme fatale of the Batman series, Jill St.

John, is the female lead here, and is fun to watch. She shows a lot of spirit in the role. Charles Grey is fun to watch as Blofeld, because he brings a real wit to the role.

The dialogue is definitely sophisticated, and it is a very stylish production that I think holds up well. And Lana Wood does a fine job here, too!

Oh, and I met her in Detroit in May ; sweet lady!! This movie is also more daring in terms of sex than any other Bond: The public display of affection the thugs Wint and Kidd show, as well as the topless scene of Lana Wood's character.

Gadgets don't seem to dominate this outing. It's no s Connery film the lead actor's older , nor a s Moore outing more serious.

This movie is sandwiched between the two eras, and it rightly should be taken on its own terms. Which means, I think it is one of the most enjoyable Bond films made--a sophisticated, stylish romp.

It is, in my view, a most enjoyable Bond and my personal favourite! The franchise stops at this point, from here-on in Bonds are "cloned" uds3 18 September Well well, this one has really elicited some polarised opinion!

Connery returned here for three principal reasons. US actor John Gavin mercifully declined the role in this film and thirdly public demand and an offer he couldn't refuse something to do with truck-loads of cash , induced Connery so slap on the old hairpiece once more!

Looking visibly older, though not in any way detrimental to the role, Sean revels in what obviously to him was his swansong as Almost a complete turnaround in style from his established mega-serious British Agent in his previous five outings, Bond is having FUN!

Virtually a total send up of the entire franchise to date, Bond veritably dribbles double entendres unloading on the audience probably the rudest and funniest dialog of the series.

Pick of the flick? Campy beyond belief, even to the extent of having a pair of confrontingly homosexual killers who bumble their way to annihilation at the film's conclusion.

The way to enjoy this one is to let it flow Have no expectations and let Connery entertain you. One right out of the bag here.

If you want it to fit a pre-conceived mould, you're in for a major disappointment. For God's sake how seriously could you take a Bond film starring singer Jimmy Dean, not to mention a couple of beefed up exquisitely proportioned female minders called Bambi and Thumper?

One of the Bonds that has improved with age AND multiple viewings. RIP James! Spondonman 30 December This last worthwhile Connery Bond film came out in the early '70's; it seemed to me even then at 12 years old that there had been a change in social attitudes — some degree of innocence had been lost in the 4 years since the previous film.

Whereas You Only Live Twice was the usual daft and deft mix of humour and action in a nonsensical plot, Diamonds Are Forever had deft action in a nonsensical and messy plot with a touch of tired and camp cynicism.

Bond is enrolled by the British government to find who is cornering the world's diamond-smuggling market and put a stop to it.

It's an un-engaging battle for the viewer though, Stout Bond looks for the most part uninterested in putting in the actual work for the money for which he was enticed back.

There's also probably the worst scene in any of his Bond films when he's escaping from Tectronics in a Moon buggy — to someone brought up on Banana Splits it's awful and almost slapstick.

John than Connery throughout. On the plus side Bond's punch up with the real Franks in the lift was exciting, the car chase through Las Vegas was amusing, and Bond getting hot under the collar in the funeral parlour was chilling — there's plenty to savour, although Plenty wasn't in it for long.

God help us if the world's safety depended on the quality of cassette tape playback! Overall it's not as witty or memorable as we'd grown accustomed to, but watchable probably even for a non-completist.

The next film in the series continued as The Saint, but to this day I still think the unshaken and unstirred Connery would have made a better Bond in the '70's, especially if he could've lost a lot of pounds and got a better wig.

Never mind, there are the 6 movies of varying excellence and consistent entertainment from to revel in every few years.

I'm an old man of 58 who saw this when it first came out. I think I remember thinking it was OK. I watched it and other Bond film again because I could see them in HD.

I'm sort of amazed at how weak and lazy this film was, just a fraction of the creativity of the first four Bond films Dr. When I say "fraction," I mean about a tenth as good.

In those earlier films, you could have some success jumping into fantasy land and imagining being part of the action and suspense, so to speak.

In this film, you'd fall asleep even trying! Connery had gain so much weight and looked so old that he is unbelievable as a carrier of "00" designation.

All I can say is, gee, I wish I could have make as much money in my life as Connery did here and give almost nothing to customer to earn it.

Finally, I liked seeing Jill St. John in high def, actually my main reason to watch this. She is extremely attractive here. She's about 68 years now.

I wonder if she is still a "10" for that age category. Aaron 22 November I don't think Connery fully had his heart in this one as his performance just isn't what it had been in previous movies.

Not that he was bad, he just wasn't in full swing this time. Of course, the plot to this one may have had something to do with it.

It starts promisingly enough when he heads to Holland I think it was, but it loses something after the coffin scene which is excellent The whole getting diamonds for a giant laser though isn't very good.

Some of the best Bond movies have some of the simpler plots and this one would have been good enough being about diamond smuggling.

John is great as the Bond babe, but she seems kind of retro as this film was put out in the 70's and she looks straight out of the early 60's.

Though this Bond isn't the best, it is still good SnoopyStyle 17 December Sean Connery returns and kills Blofeld in the first 10 minutes.

Then he's put onto the case of missing South African diamonds. He assumes the identity of diamond smuggler Peter Franks.

But his investigation leads him to Las Vegas and an unexpected nemesis. This is probably one of the weaker Bond movie.

It is just not exotic to be stuck in Vegas for so long. It's the difference between real locations and Hollywood sets. Vegas could be fun, but it's not exotic.

Although, it is interesting to see the old style Vegas before the modern built-up. The best new names have to be Bambi and Thumper.

They are amazingly hot bodyguards. And then we got sexy Jill St. John firing her gun in a bikini. No matter what happens, a Bond movie will usually have great Bond girls.

There is more sly humor than ever before. There are the sarcastic killer pair Mr Kidd and Mr Wint with their dead pan humor. The sexual innuendos are thicker than ever.

There is a bad Roger Moore quality to this Bond movie. Only Moore knows how to do it with a nudge and a wink. The moon rover chase is one of the stupidest thing ever.

And there isn't anything superior in any of the designs either. A tiny oil platform isn't that impressive for an evil hideout. James Bond travels to Las Vegas to solve missing diamonds mystery.

TxMike 10 November I found the recently released 3-DVD set of Connery as Bond movies at my local public library, and this is one of them.

It starts off with a glimpse of workers in diamond mines and the way some theft and smuggling comes about. Then in a broader issue, large quantities of diamonds are disappearing.

Sean Connery age 40 , back as James Bond, is sent in to investigate. That takes him to the casinos of Las Vegas.

The two Bond girls in this entry come across as slightly stronger and more cunning than other examples; they're more than just pretty faces.

Some fans claim that this movie is "too American," but Bond fits right into the Vegas setting with no trouble. It's a solid, recommended entry in the series.

Families can talk about the movie's violence. How much is shown and how much is implied? How does the violence in this movie compare to violence in more modern-day movies?

What does it mean for Bond to have a "license to kill"? Does Bond ever feel remorse from any of his victims?

Does he learn anything? Would you like to have such a license? Should anyone have one? How did you feel about the Mr. Kidd characters? If the movie suggests that they are gay, do they come across as good role models?

What is the difference between Bond's appreciation of a fine bottle of sherry, and a character that drinks to get drunk? Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners.

See how we rate. Streaming options powered by JustWatch. Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase.

Thank you for your support. Our ratings are based on child development best practices. We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate.

The star rating reflects overall quality. Learn how we rate. Parents' Ultimate Guide to Support our work! Diamonds Are Forever. Movie review by Jeffrey M.

Anderson , Common Sense Media. Popular with kids. Connery's last official Bond film is energetic but violent. PG minutes. Rate movie. Watch or buy.

Based on 2 reviews. Based on 10 reviews. Get it now Searching for streaming and purchasing options Common Sense is a nonprofit organization.

Your purchase helps us remain independent and ad-free. Get it now on Searching for streaming and purchasing options X of Y Official trailer.

A lot or a little? The parents' guide to what's in this movie. Positive Messages. Bond drinks a glass of sherry and has a sip of whisky.

One of the Bond girls smokes a cigarette. Stay up to date on new reviews. Get full reviews, ratings, and advice delivered weekly to your inbox.

User Reviews Parents say Kids say. Adult Written by baka yagi June 1, Report this review. Adult Written by jmo97 October 21, Among the weaker Bond films, but still is entertaining Diamonds Are Forever is a very mixed bag for me: it has a weak performance by the villain, some really silly action scenes, and I didn't think this story w Continue reading.

For the all the James Bond fans, this is one of the biggest movies of , cause' it's the most exciting movie that Sean Connery did!!!!

It will hold Kid, 12 years old August 9, Best Bond Film so far Parents need to know that this film is more violent and has more sex then the previous bond films.

It is a really good film. What's the story? Continue reading Show less. Is it any good? Talk to your kids about How are the women depicted in this movie?

Online-Musik-Magazin im Bereich Metal, Rock und Gothic mit News,Reviews, Liveberichten, Interviews und Hintergrundartikeln. Diamonds Are Forever Shirt- Frottee-Hemd In Matchstick Ob Sie vorhaben, die Welt zu retten, oder einfach nur auf Entdeckungsreise gehen möchten – in. DVD-Review: Connerys Abschied - OutNow hat «James Bond - Diamonds Are Forever ()» für dich angesehen. Yet, such reviews appear in hindsight to have been inevitable. So, today, I'm reviewing “Diamonds are Forever” just because I really like Las Vegas and the. Diamonds Are Forever Book Review von Calvin Dyson vor 1 Jahr 17 Minuten Aufrufe This was a slog of a read It made for a good. Novoline Online Handy Case Secure transaction. Audible Download Audiobooks. Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Buy new:. Es gibt nicht wirklich einen absolut schlechten James-Bond-Film, daher: Daumen hoch! Disabling it will Loto-Bw.De in some disabled or missing features. John Barry's score was perfectly suited to each scene. Select Your Cookie Preferences We use cookies Douglas Bewertungen similar Haare Schneiden Spiele to enhance your shopping experience, to provide our services, understand how customers use our services so we can make improvements, and display ads. Top critical review. Es lohnt sich wirklich!!! An absolute joy to wear.

Diamonds Are Forever Review - LEGS DIAMOND - Diamonds Are Forever

It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness. Wir verwenden Cookies, um Ihre Nutzererfahrung zu verbessern. Bond Meets Bambi And Thumper 3. Ihr Warenkorb. Approved third parties also use these tools in connection with our display of ads. Accept Cookies Customise Cookies.

Diamonds Are Forever Review Customer reviews

Umso mehr erstaunt war ich, als ich die Bingo Tel CD bekam. Only 1 left in stock. Customers who viewed this item also Bauernhof Spiele Kostenlos Ohne Anmeldung. War diese Bewertung Magi Game Verbinden mit:. Und es wird nicht besser, wenn Bond z. Review by spencer on 27 Nov review stating James bond shirt Live this shirt. Alas there are no photos of Lola Larson and Trina Parks as the acrobatic Bambi and Thumper kicking the crap out of like he deserved it. Bei "Goldfinger" und "Man lebt nur zweimal" wurde sowas besser gemacht, wenn Bond bei Auric Enterprises bzw. This top is a little larger than I was expecting, less fitted than say a Sebastian or other terry towelling but then I guess it's meant to be like that given the era it was styled from. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book Dispatch to this address when you check out Learn more. Dieser Bondfilm ist an manchen Stellen ganz lustig. Listen Now with Amazon Music. Note: This item is eligible for click and Wimmelbildspiele Deutsch Kostenlos Ohne Download. Buy used:. Einfach nur gut! From Russia With Love. DPReview Digital Photography. Weiss gar nicht was alle haben, im Gegensatz zu vielen darauffolgenden Bondfilmen ist dies wirklich kein schlechter Thriller.

Diamonds Are Forever Review Video

Diamonds Are Forever (1971) Review Diamonds Are Forever Review

2 thoughts on “Diamonds Are Forever Review

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *